Look twice.Find the gem.

AI agents and MCP servers, each published with its source and what the checks found.

Marketplace

  • Everything
  • AI agents
  • Apps
  • MCP servers
  • Templates
  • What people want
  • What changed this week
  • The verification standard
  • The ooruby Index
  • Servers that publish no source
  • Reliability guides
  • What the catalogue holds
  • Sell here

Our library

  • Everything, in one place
  • Guides
  • Glossary
  • Calculators
  • Checklists and cheat sheets
  • Community

ooruby

  • Home
  • For teams
  • Site status
  • Company projects
  • RSS feed

Verification records what our published tests found on a specific version at a specific date. It is not a warranty, and it does not certify that software is free of defects.

Rubricv1.0
AI agentsAppsMCP serversTemplatesWantedCommunityOur library
Sign inSell
Catalogue/Apps/Seo CLI

Seo CLI

lobehub · App

Lobe seo is a CLI tool that automate generation seo content for mdx

Not claimed by its maker. Is this yours? Prove it and answer the findings

SEappContent

What else was checked

Publisher and name

Nothing found across 5 checks run. Checked 2026-10-02.

Maintenance

Abandoned

Last release 11 Jun 2025 (1.7.0), 477 days before this check on 2 Oct 2026.

Read from the npm registry's publish history, read by the nightly publisher check.

Release activity only: it says nothing about quality or safety, and a finished small package can be fine without releases. How it is measured

Not yet tested
Licence and provenance
finding
no LICENCE file at the root (.)
Tool description integrity
nothing to read
Pattern set 1.0 matched nothing on 2026-10-01, but none of the descriptions the package ships runs to 120 characters, so there was little for a rule to read.
It reads the descriptions the package ships, not what the server says when it runs, and a clean description is not the same thing as a safe tool.
Row-level security
nothing to read
No Supabase migrations in the 7 files of the published package read on 2026-10-02, so there was nothing for this check to read.
Not covered: A reading of files cannot prove a policy is enforced at run time: whether these migrations were applied, whether row-level security was switched on another way (the dashboard, SQL run by hand), or what a table holds. A database only the app's own server can reach (SQLite, or Postgres behind a server that holds the only connection) needs no row-level security for this reason, and its migrations are not read.
Object-level authorisation
nothing to read
No Supabase migrations in the 7 files of the published package read on 2026-10-02, so there was nothing for this check to read.
Not covered: Whether the app means every account to edit everything (an admin tool whose only account is its owner's), whether sign-up is open (a dashboard setting), and anything about a policy whose expression looks at the row. Whether the migrations were applied is not known. Policies that let anyone read every row are not counted here.
CORS configuration
no match, 6 code files read
App check set 1.0 matched nothing across 6 code files, 7 files of the published package read on 2026-10-02.
Not covered: Whether it matters. A server that checks a token sent in a header gives a foreign page nothing it could not do without the browser, and a server bound to the loopback address is reachable only from pages open on the same machine (which is still every page that machine opens). A value chosen at run time, such as a variable that falls back to *, is not read: the hand count found one such server, and it is not in the figure.
Not covered: Whether the server reads cookies at all, whether the echo is guarded by a check this reading does not follow, and anything decided at run time.
No shipped credentials
no match, 7 files read
App check set 1.0 matched no credential in a format it recognises, bundles included, across the 7 files of the published package read on 2026-10-02.
Not covered: Whether a key still works (none is ever tried, because trying one would be using it), credentials in formats the check does not name, anything in a repository's history, and files the nightly reading does not reach when a package is over its caps.

Published because it was found. A finding is information about where the limits are, not a verdict that the software is unsafe.

What this does not cover

  • ·Everything. Treat it as you would software from anywhere else.

Tool descriptions are read with pattern set v1.0, published with every rule, its sources and how often it has been wrong.

App checks are read with app check set v1.0, published with every rule, what it does not cover and how often it has been wrong.

Receipt history: every signed receipt for every version of this listing, and what changed between them.

What it does

Lobe seo is a CLI tool that automate generation seo content for mdx

Compare with

  • I18n CLIside by side
  • Get Llms Txtside by side
Compare all 3

How far this has been checked

Static scanned

What it establishes
Its published package, or for a hosted server its source repository at a recorded commit, was read file by file, without running it, by every check in our current scan.
What it does not
How it behaves when it runs, or anything the scan does not read yet: several rubric checks, the repository's history, and compiled code in folders named dist or build. For a hosted server, that the endpoint runs the code that was read. The ooruby Index sets out exactly what was read.
Exactly what was read
Version 1.7.0, the file with digest sha512-75AK9rutQjsbBdMOWbJEWf6Z9CiXMluo2wzoJ+8aB9Z+STWWIix02a+v3geH9K3I4MSf5+CzC1o3AwFPDfaFKA==, as the registry publishes it. A published version cannot be replaced, so this names the same bytes for anyone who checks.
Authentication
Runs locally. No hosted endpoint is listed for this package. You run it on your own machine, so there is no endpoint of ours to authenticate against.
How the rungs work

Adding it

Run it with:

npx -y @lobehub/seo-cli@1.7.0

Pinned to 1.7.0, which is the version the findings above were found in. Drop the version to take whatever is newest, and the report on this page stops describing what you installed.

148,423 installs last month · no published advisories · version current · checked 2026-10-05

Where this came from

Registry
npm
Package
@lobehub/seo-cli
Version read
1.7.0
Resolved
2026-08-23
Open the source(opens in a new tab)

No build provenance published. The repository above is the one the publisher declared, and nothing links it to the package you would install. That is not a mark against this listing, since most packages are published this way, but it is a check nobody can run.

The badge, if this is your listing

It renders the current rung (static scanned) and links back here, where what that does and does not establish is one click away. It updates itself as the evidence deepens.

[![ooruby: static scanned](https://ooruby.com/api/badge/lobehub-seo-cli)](https://ooruby.com/market/lobehub-seo-cli)

About this listing

Kind
App
Category
Content
Pricing
Free
Sandbox
No
Hosted
No
Updated
2026-08-23
Price
Free
Get it freeVisit maker
Rating
no reviews yet
0 want this so far
Sign in to vote

Sign in to watch this listing and hear when its version, rung or findings change.

More from lobehub

See the storefront
I1appContent
1 findingStatic scanned

I18n CLI

lobehub
Free

Lobe i18n is a CLI tool that automate translate your i18n localization with AI

215.1k installs/moMIT

Similar apps

All apps
GLappContent
1 findingStatic scanned

Get Llms Txt

romankurnovskii
Free

Generate LLM-friendly llms.txt files from markdown and MDX content files

64.2k installs/moMIT
CCappDeveloper tools
4 findingsStatic scanned

Claude Code

anthropic-ai
Free

Use Claude, Anthropic's AI assistant, right from your terminal. Claude can understand your codebase, edit files, run terminal commands, and handle entire workflows for you.

80.2M installs/moSEE LICENSE IN README.md
EWappDeveloper tools
2 findingsStatic scanned

Earendil Works Pi AI

earendil-works
Free

Unified LLM API with automatic model discovery and provider configuration

14.6M installs/moMIT

Verification records what our published tests found on a specific version at a specific date. It is not a warranty, and it does not certify that software is free of defects.