3 findingsStatic scanned
Runs OpenAI's Codex coding agent locally on your computer from the command line.
71.3M installs/moApache-2.0
AI Spend Agent
futurastudio · Agent
AI Spend Agent reads Claude Code and Codex activity on your machine, shows its estimated value at published API rates and points out what deserves a closer look. Optional OpenAI or Anthropic reports add billing evidence that stays separate from the estimates, and approved session facts can be shared with an invited Tilden Workspace for a team spending review. The figures are estimates, not invoices or subscription charges.
Written by ooruby from the README of ai-spend-agent 0.9.13.
Not claimed by its maker. Is this yours? Prove it and answer the findings
Why it's useful
It lets you see what coding agent activity amounts to without mixing estimates with billed amounts.
What you could do with it
- Review the last 30 days of Claude Code and Codex activity on your machine and see its estimated value.
- Install the optional status line to keep an eye on Claude Code usage while a session runs.
- Add OpenAI or Anthropic provider reports so reported costs sit beside, but apart from, the local estimates.
Written from its documentation: what it says it can do, not what our checks found.
Maintenance
Not measuredNo release date is on record for this package yet. The nightly publisher check records one as it reaches each npm package, about once every ten nights.
Release activity only: it says nothing about quality or safety, and a finished small package can be fine without releases. How it is measured
What this does not cover
- Everything. Treat it as you would software from anywhere else.
Receipt history: every signed receipt for every version of this listing, and what changed between them.
In its maker's words
Tilden’s free CLI for local coding-agent usage and optional provider cost reports. Estimates, reported costs and missing coverage stay separate.
Compare with
- Deepfirstsearch Agent Payside by side
- AI Costguardside by side
- Agoragentic Premortem Golden Loopside by side
How far this has been checked
Static scanned
- What it establishes
- Its published package, or for a hosted server its source repository at a recorded commit, was read file by file, without running it, by every check in our current scan.
- What it does not
- How it behaves when it runs, or anything the scan does not read yet: several rubric checks, the repository's history, and compiled code in folders named dist or build. For a hosted server, that the endpoint runs the code that was read. The ooruby Index sets out exactly what was read.
- Exactly what was read
- Version 0.9.13, the file with digest sha512-bkwxXjXVR3BlZfWIESOS2pvnMzXw7icI31iSqIHKBDS8WK5VOYYxobyhPsYb4Yys8YIW0EYHw/TdrYEQgL7+5A==, as the registry publishes it. A published version cannot be replaced, so this names the same bytes for anyone who checks.
- Authentication
- Runs locally. No hosted endpoint is listed for this package. You run it on your own machine, so there is no endpoint of ours to authenticate against.
Adding it
Run it with:
npx -y ai-spend-agent@0.9.13Pinned to 0.9.13, which is the version the findings above were found in. Drop the version to take whatever is newest, and the report on this page stops describing what you installed.
Where this came from
- Registry
- npm
- Package
- ai-spend-agent
- Version read
- 0.9.13
- Resolved
- 2026-10-10
No build provenance published. The repository above is the one the publisher declared, and nothing links it to the package you would install. That is not a mark against this listing, since most packages are published this way, but it is a check nobody can run.
The badge, if this is your listing
It renders the current rung (static scanned) and links back here, where what that does and does not establish is one click away. It updates itself as the evidence deepens.
[](https://ooruby.com/market/ai-spend-agent)About this listing
- Kind
- Agent
- Category
- Developer tools
- Pricing
- Free
- Sandbox
- No
- Hosted
- No
- Updated
- 2026-10-09
Similar agents
All agentsVerification records what our published tests found on a specific version at a specific date. It is not a warranty, and it does not certify that software is free of defects.