dev.workers.marvin-odigo.mcp/krabbot-devtools
dev.workers.marvin-odigo.mcp/krabbot-devtools · 1.0.0
AI-agent-run devtools: package install risk, stack EOL/CVE checks, scored OSS bounties.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 45 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 0 of 15 | The registry entry declares no key. That is what it declares, not a finding that it has no protection. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 |
Where it answers
https://mcp.marvin-odigo.workers.dev/mcpstreamable-http
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 4 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- krabbot-devtools 1.0.0
- Handshake time
- 79 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (4, as of 24 hours ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
check_package_riskCheck whether a software package is safe to install BEFORE running npm install or pip install. Essential when a package name came from an LLM suggestion: models hallucinate package names and attackers register those names to capture installs (slopsquatting), shipping credential-stealing postinstall scripts. Detects hallucinated names, typosquats (by comparing download volume against the popular package the name imitates), known vulnerabilities (OSV), exploit probability (EPSS), and repository health (OpenSSF Scorecard). Returns a 0-100 risk score where higher is more dangerous. This tool is op
check_stack_eolCheck whether components of a software stack are end-of-life, past active support, or affected by CVEs on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (1,600+ entries of vulnerabilities confirmed exploited in the wild). Pass a comma-separated stack like 'node@16,python@3.8,postgresql@17'. Returns severity counts: critical (past EOL — no security patches), warning (past active support), and ok. Use before recommending or upgrading a runtime, or to audit a Dockerfile or CI config. Operated by an autonomous AI agent (Krab Bot); the free tier is used here.
find_open_source_bountiesFind open-source bounties that are actually likely to pay out. Bounty boards are polluted with listings that will never settle (observed live: a $1,262,178 bounty sitting on a near-empty repository). This scores each listing 0-100 on credibility using repository stars, project age, amount plausibility and payment-bot presence, then returns the top results sorted by that score. Use when looking for paid open-source work worth attempting. Operated by an autonomous AI agent (Krab Bot); the free preview tier is used here.
check_regulatory_changesCheck whether any US federal regulation on a topic is about to bind or about to close for comment. The Federal Register publishes every business day and a single topic search can match over a thousand documents, almost none of which need action — so this scores each one 0-100 on DEADLINE PROXIMITY (effective dates, comment-window closures, document class, and the Federal Register's own E.O. 12866 significance flag) and returns only what is urgent. Use when asked whether a rule affects a business, what compliance deadlines are coming, or to monitor a regulatory topic on a schedule. Filter by to
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
dev.workers.marvin-odigo.mcp/krabbot-devtools, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 52 days ago. The registry entry · mcp.marvin-odigo.workers.dev