ScentVerdict
com.scentverdict/fragrances · 1.0.0
UK fragrance catalogue with verdicts, similarity scores, scent profiles and drydowns.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 45 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 0 of 15 | The registry entry declares no key. That is what it declares, not a finding that it has no protection. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 |
Where it answers
https://scentverdict.com/mcpstreamable-http
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 6 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- ScentVerdict 2.0.0
- Handshake time
- 137 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (6, as of 33 hours ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
get_scent_profileGet how a fragrance develops over the wear: opening, heart and base phases, the notes in each, and how many hours each note persists on skin. Use this when the user asks how something evolves, how long it lasts, how it changes through the day, or what the drydown is like. The per-note hours are values held by ScentVerdict against each note rather than a general impression of the fragrance, and they are estimates. Use get_fragrance instead for the verdict, price and general description.
search_fragrancesResolve a fragrance name to catalogue entries. Call this FIRST whenever a name is partial, misspelled, or could mean more than one product, then pass the returned slug to another tool. Many fragrances share a name across concentrations and launch years, and flankers hide behind qualifiers, so guessing the variant silently produces the wrong answer for the rest of the conversation. Results carry concentration and launch year precisely so you can tell them apart, and you should offer the user the choice when several match. Use get_fragrance instead when you already hold an exact slug.
find_similar_fragrancesFind fragrances similar to one the user already knows, optionally steered in a direction such as cheaper, fresher, longer lasting or less sweet. Use this whenever the user names a fragrance and wants something like it: a cheaper alternative, a budget version, something that smells similar, or a gift for someone whose current fragrance they know ('he wears X, what else would suit him'). Each match carries a similarity score computed by ScentVerdict for that specific pair. The cheaper direction lists pairings ScentVerdict has curated first, then similar fragrances priced below the anchor where w
compare_fragrancesCompare exactly two fragrances side by side using ScentVerdict's own note data: which notes they share, which differ, both verdicts, and both prices for the user's country. Use this whenever the user is choosing between two named fragrances, or asks which of two is better, or how two differ. Use find_similar_fragrances instead when they want alternatives to one fragrance rather than a head to head.
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
com.scentverdict/fragrances, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 16 days ago. The registry entry · scentverdict.com