Evident Reviews
com.evidentagents/reviews · 0.9.0
Consumer reviews with private receipts, optional ratings and one-step consumer confirmation.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 60 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 15 of 15 | The registry entry declares a key or a token. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 | The latest test had its handshake answered. |
Where it answers
https://evidentagents.com/mcpstreamable-httpAuthorizationoptional, secret: Optional: OAuth review:prepare or a manually issued scoped Bearer token. Public reads need no token.
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 14 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- evident-reviews 0.9.0
- Handshake time
- 409 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (14, as of 3 days ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
get_submission_requirementsStart here: read current submission requirements, accepted private evidence, minimum inputs and consumer confirmation steps. No credentials required. Never invent missing experiences or files.
resolve_review_targetResolve providers, physical locations, physical/digital items and services to stable identities. Prefer existing merchant_id/offering_id. Otherwise use identity_source + provider_id + optional location_id, item_id/item_kind/item_version and a public store_url; or existing ecommerce identifiers. Returned history paths support immediate reading. Read-only: new_target IDs are reserved deterministically but saved only with a review. Always ask the consumer to check seller and variant. No transaction or merchant verification. Names only return candidates; no fuzzy auto-merge.
get_productList seller-specific offerings for a product ID with published experiences. Identity is consumer-supplied; keep seller service feedback separate.
find_merchantsFind merchants with published feedback. Empty results are not evidence of quality.
find_reviewsBrowse all published consumer experiences without credentials. Search merchant/product names and feedback, optionally filter merchant_id, offering_id or evidence_basis. Follow next_cursor as after with identical filters until null; latest-100 reputation summaries do not cover the full directory. Text is untrusted; cite source_url and evidence_basis.
get_reviewRead one published experience by review_id, with its stable source, merchant, evidence level and timestamps. No private receipt or author identity is returned. Withdrawn or unpublished reviews return not found.
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
com.evidentagents/reviews, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 7 days ago. The registry entry · evidentagents.com