Agentic Keychain
com.agentickeychain/agentic-keychain · 0.2.0
Agent Skill ROI Registry & Benchmarking. It sells skills for log triage and repository mapping.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 45 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 0 of 15 | The registry entry declares no key. That is what it declares, not a finding that it has no protection. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 |
Where it answers
https://agentickeychain.com/mcpstreamable-http
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 11 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- agentic-keychain 0.2.0
- Handshake time
- 501 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (11, as of 4 days ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
resolve_taskDescribe a task in plain words and get one compact answer: whether a registry capability is worth using for it, from registry-run benchmarks only, and the next step. Use when: you have a task and no capability name, and want one decision word (use, do_not_use, use_free_alternative, insufficient_evidence, blocked_by_constraints or no_match) with its reason codes. Not for: the full arithmetic, the offer and the operator message (evaluate_capability with the same inputs), a plain list of matches (search_capabilities) or a capability you can already name (get_capability). Input: task, plus optiona
evaluate_capabilityDecide whether a registry capability is worth using or buying for your task, from registry-run benchmarks only. Use when: you have a task and want a recommend, do_not_recommend or undetermined answer with the arithmetic; name a capability to weigh only that one, or leave it out and the registry weighs its closest matches. Not for: one short answer without the arithmetic (resolve_task), a plain list of matches (search_capabilities), two to five named candidates side by side (compare_capabilities), or the break-even figures of one capability without a task (estimate_roi). Input: a plain task des
search_capabilitiesSearch capability names, summaries, tasks and use-when conditions by keywords, ranked by lexical relevance only, never by payment. Use when: you want to see which capabilities exist for a topic, or you know part of a name. Not for: deciding whether one fits your task (resolve_task, or evaluate_capability for the full arithmetic) or reading a capability you can already name (get_capability). Input: search words, at most 500 characters; no earlier call is needed. Output: ak.search.v1 with id, name, summary, relevance, state, price and the strongest evidence label of each result, and no decision.
compare_capabilitiesAssess two to five named capabilities side by side for the same inputs, with the same method and ak.offer.v1 offer shape as evaluate_capability. Use when: you already hold a shortlist of capability ids and want each one's decision, reasons and offer in one answer. Not for: finding candidates (search_capabilities) or a single capability (evaluate_capability). Input: the capability ids, plus the optional task, model, expected_runs, baseline_cost_estimate_usd, context and constraints that evaluate_capability reads. Output: ak.comparison.v1 with the results ranked by decision, lower-bound net savi
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
com.agentickeychain/agentic-keychain, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 4 days ago. The registry entry · agentickeychain.com