Rams
ai.rams/rams · 1.1.0
Design review for UI code: 291 rules, scored 0-100 with fixes and git-applyable patches.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 60 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 15 of 15 | The registry entry declares a key or a token. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 | The latest test had its handshake answered. |
Where it answers
https://worker.rams.ai/mcpstreamable-httpAuthorizationrequired, secret: Bearer rams_YOUR_API_KEY. Create a free API key at https://www.rams.ai/app/settings/api-keys (free plan includes 30 reviews/month).
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 4 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- rams 1.0.0
- Handshake time
- 129 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (4, as of 6 days ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
usageCheck how many Rams reviews this workspace has used and has left (rolling 30 days, shared between the GitHub App and MCP). Free to call — does not consume a review.
review_filesRun a Rams design review over UI files (React, Vue, Svelte, CSS). Returns a 0-100 score (criticals cap it: one caps at 59, two at 49, three or more at 39), issues with severity, category, file:line, and concrete fixes. Call it whenever UI code has been written or changed: before committing, when the user asks how the design looks, or to check your own work after editing a component. Reviewing the handful of files you just touched is the normal case — it is cheap, and you do not need to ask permission first. Only a whole-codebase audit (dozens of files across many batches) is worth checking wit
quick_reviewFast design check over the UI files you just changed. Returns issues with severity, category and file:line, in about 10 seconds. Cheap: five quick checks cost one review credit (two on the free plan), so a whole editing session spends a fraction of one review. Use this one CONSTANTLY: after writing or editing a component, before committing, whenever you want to know if what you just wrote is sound. You do not need to ask the user first. It returns no score and no ready-made patch: fix the issues yourself in the files you already have open. When the user wants a score to keep, a patch to apply,
verify_fixesRe-check previous review_files findings against updated file contents. Returns fixed vs still-present per finding. Much cheaper and faster than a full re-review; does NOT consume review quota. Use after applying fixes.
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
ai.rams/rams, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 68 days ago. The registry entry · www.rams.ai