PrePublish - YouTube script QA
ai.prepublish/script-audit · 1.1.0
Audit a YouTube script before recording: hook, pacing, drop-off risk, copy-paste rewrites.
Nobody here has read this server's code, because it publishes none. The description above is the maker's own, from the registry. A connection test shows whether it answers and what tools it says it has; it never calls a tool, so it cannot show what one does with your data.
Where it sits in the directory's order
What can be seen from outside, weighed as the directory publishes.
Observable signals: 45 of 100 points (at most 60 here)
| Input | Points | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
| Source published | held at 0 | No entry here publishes source: that is what puts it in this directory. |
| Licence stated | held at 0 | With no files, there is nothing for a licence to be stated in or held against. |
| Advisory state | held at 0 | Advisory databases index packages, and these entries publish none, so there is nothing to look up. |
| Auth declared | 0 of 15 | The registry entry declares no key. That is what it declares, not a finding that it has no protection. |
| Latest connection test reached it | 20 of 20 |
Where it answers
https://mcp.prepublish.aistreamable-http
Connection test
The MCP handshake, then a request for the tool list, with no key and no data of yours. Run nightly, and by anyone, at most once every ten minutes per server.
It completed the handshake and listed 6 tools.
- Protocol
- 2025-06-18
- Calls itself
- prepublish 1.0.0
- Handshake time
- 403 ms
- HTTP status
- 200
The tools it lists (6, as of 6 days ago)
The tool-description rules found nothing in these descriptions. They look for instructions aimed at a model and for hidden characters; they cannot see what a tool does when it runs.
audit_scriptRun Prepublish's full audit on a YouTube script the user has already written. Returns hook, structure and pacing scores, a script-level attention-risk map naming the passages most likely to lose viewers, and a copy-paste rewrite for each flagged passage. Choose this when the user has a finished or near-finished draft and wants to know what is weak before they record. Do not use it to generate a script, to review a published video, or to check grammar. A free result is released by email, so ask the user for an address rather than guessing one. This is a text-only check of an unrecorded script.
get_auditFetch the current state of an audit that was started earlier, using the analysis_id that audit_script returned. Use this when a previous audit was still running, or when the user refers back to an audit from earlier in the conversation. It performs no new analysis and costs nothing. This is a text-only check of an unrecorded script. It maps relative attention risk inside the draft. It does not measure or predict published YouTube retention, and it cannot account for delivery, editing, thumbnail, topic or distribution.
audit_hookScore just the opening lines of a YouTube script: how much attention each sentence pulls, whether it opens a curiosity gap, how far away the payoff sits, plus the top issues and rewritten alternatives. Choose this when the user shares only a hook or opening paragraph, or wants a fast second opinion before auditing a whole draft. Cheaper and narrower than audit_script. This is a text-only check of an unrecorded script. It maps relative attention risk inside the draft. It does not measure or predict published YouTube retention, and it cannot account for delivery, editing, thumbnail, topic or dis
check_authenticityCheck a script against YouTube's inauthentic-content expectations: whether it reads as mass-produced, templated or repetitive, which signals fire, and what to change. Returns a score, a risk level, the firing signals with quotes, and remediation steps. Choose this when the user worries about reused content, AI-sounding scripts, or a channel that repeats a formula. This reports text-level signals only; it is not a monetisation decision and does not speak for YouTube.
How this entry becomes a listing
For the maker. The catalogue lists what it can read, and this server publishes nothing to read yet. There are two routes, and only the first is open today.
Publish the source Open today
- Put the server's source in a public repository on github.com, with a licence.
- Keep a server.json in that repository naming this server,
ai.prepublish/script-audit, and declare the repository in it:"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/owner/repo", "source": "github" }, adding"subfolder"when the server lives in a folder. - Publish that version to the official MCP registry.
- The nightly registry sweep records the declaration. This page stays, dated, and says the source is declared but not yet read.
- The catalogue reads declared repositories at a pinned commit, in batches run by hand, and lists the servers that meet the batch's rules (among them a server.json at that commit naming the server, an https endpoint and a licence). When it lists this server, this page links to the listing. There is no schedule, so no date can be promised.
List it through the maker studio Not open yet
From the official MCP registry, last updated there 18 days ago. The registry entry · prepublish.ai